Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
People and existence
Universal Declaration of Material Rights
Whereas it is essential to recognize materials as being both the foundation and an integral part of the fabric of life,
There is no difference between human beings and materials. They are all one. We think we live in a dualistic world and therefore we sustain separation. Nothing is separate of each other or one another. All is one. It is not of life itself to come up with rights. And nature is not part of a closed system. We as human beings are not part of a closed system. Materials are not part of a closed system. All is boundless energy. Everything consists of atoms, molecules, neurons, biophotons. This energy is complete, whole, spontaneous, unguided, unpredictable, unconditional loving, wild, chaotic and surprised. We as human beings are psychological constructs. We have a DNA inprint but during our life other psychological constructs put ideas, beliefs, opinions, morals, values, preassumptions etc. in us. So we become the same and in some way still unique. We think we are our body, we think we must become something or someone, we think we must have a purpose, we think there is something to long for, we think we have free will, we think we have a choice, we thing there is right and wrong, we think we can determine our lives. In fact none of it exist because human beings don’t exist. They are psychological constructs trapped in a dualistic world which they created themselves. Because of this every now and then we experience cramped energy inside of us. There must be more in life. Loniging arises. Desires as well. So, we start searching, we try to find a guru, we buy more stuff to fele better, we take anti depressants, we become addicted, we eat more sugar, we make plans etc. There is no need for that is a world of boundless energy which is all. All is one. All is everything and nothing. Nothing really happens. It is just energy shifting around from one place to another. Apparently. A wall is not a wall, it is just a wall walling. Liberation for human beings and materials can only be obtained when the I, the Me collapses. All that will be left is boundless energy formless and shaped in forms. All of what is written here is just an idea, a description of life itself. They are just words. There is not truth in it. Nothing is true. Not even life itself knows truth. It does not even know itself. It just is. Like the human being without the I. It just is. If the I (ego, identifcations, the personhood, the Self) in human beings collapses more and more, liberation will be there, here and everywhere and rights for human beings and materials will not even be here. Entities shaped in bodies will automatically take care of this Earth as a steward. Stewards that act from being. Being boundless energy of itself. Unfortunately liberation can not be planned. Like life itself can not be planned. It just is. But we can spread these words without any intention, goal or plan. So, this will not make any difference except for the ones that resonate with it. When they are in that resonance they will know the I is not there. The I might even explode or implode. But no one can tell if it will happen. It can happen anywhere. Apparently.
Albert van Duijn
December 27, 2015 at 7:11 am - Reply
Ontwijk het woord ‘rechten’; gebruik liever de term ‘wederzijdse verbinding’.
Het begrip ‘recht’ impliceert ‘bezit’, terwijl de nieuwe visie “het einde van bezit” weerspiegelt.
We hebben de afgelopen 70 jaar gezien dat rechten leiden tot een claimcultuur waarin geld de hoofdrol is gaan spelen.
Maar de allereerste vraag die gesteld dient te worden, is: Moeten wij de Universele Verklaring van de wederzijdse verbinding tussen Materiaal en Mens in het Engels schrijven?
In Nederland niet, doch, om de vorming van de nieuwe wereldtaal tegemoet te komen, stel ik voor het parallel/simultaan, zowel in het Nederlands als in het Engels, op te maken.
Ieder woord dient gewogen te worden. ‘Mutual obligation’ impliceert niet enkel een verbinding, maar ook ‘verplichting’ en ‘verbintenis’. Het is een contract dat twee partijen betreft. Het is een ‘huwelijk’, het is wederzijds, waarna zo’n dergelijk contract nog steeds kan stranden.
In deze zin kunnen wij een Universele Verklaring van de wederzijdse verbinding tussen Materiaal en Mens als een dertiende amendement* beschouwen, een anti-slavernijwet, die het materiaal vrij maakt en optilt tot een hoger plan.
Aan de ene kant ‘dient’ materiaal ons; wij mensen echter zullen (het) materiaal ten dienste moeten staan. Het is inherent aan het leven. Hierbij gaat het uiteraard om verantwoordelijkheid en vrije wil.
Laten we niet spreken over een schuldbekentenis, maar eerder over een nieuwe kijk op onze relatie met de wereld.
Het denken over de nieuwe relatie tussen materiaal en mens is mijns inziens een signaal dat ons systeem zich dient te wijzigen en ook gaat veranderen in een wereld die de grote Tijdsperiode van Aquarius cq De Waterman tegemoet treedt. Een periode waarin grote en grootse geestelijke ontwikkelingen zullen vrijkomen.
Wanneer wij gast zijn binnen ons gesloten systeem, dan roept dit direct de vraag op: Maar wie is dan de Gastheer?
* gerefereert wordt hier aan het amendement van de Amerikaanse Grondwet dat in 1865 de slevernij wenste af te schaffen.
Albert van Duijn
December 27, 2015 at 8:33 am - Reply
So:
Avoid the word ‘rights’; it is better to use the term ‘mutual obligation’.
The notion ‘rights’ implies ‘possession’, while the new vision mirrors ‘the end of possession’.
In the past 70 years we have seen that rights lead to a claiming cultur in which money plays the lead.
But the very first question we need to ask ourselves is: Should we write te Universal Declaration of mutual obligation between material and man in English? Not in Holland I suppose, but to accomodate the new world-language I suggest to create it parallel and in a simultanious manor, both in Dutch and in English.
Every word needs to be weighed and considered. ‘Mutual obligation’ implies not only a connection, but also a commitment and an alliance. It is a contract from both parties. It is a marriage, it is mutual and such a contract still can fail itself. In this sence we are able to look upon the Universal Declaration of mutual obligation between material and man as a thirteenth amendement*, an anti-slaverybill which frees Material and lifts it to a higher degree.
On one hand (the) Material ‘serves’ us, however we (men, the people) should serve (the) Material. It’s inherent to life. It concerns here responsablility and free will. Let us not speak about a confession of guilt, but rather of a new insight about our relationship towards the world.
In my view the thinking about this new relationship between Material and Mankind is the signal that our system needs to and is going to change in a world that is heading to the big Time era of Aquarius cq The Waterman. A Period in which large and great spiritual developments will be set free. When we are guests in our closed system, then immediately the question comes to light: Who is the Host?
* refered to here is the Amendement of the American Constitution that wished to erase slavery in 1865.
There is no difference between human beings and materials. They are all one. We think we live in a dualistic world and therefore we sustain separation. Nothing is separate of each other or one another. All is one. It is not of life itself to come up with rights. And nature is not part of a closed system. We as human beings are not part of a closed system. Materials are not part of a closed system. All is boundless energy. Everything consists of atoms, molecules, neurons, biophotons. This energy is complete, whole, spontaneous, unguided, unpredictable, unconditional loving, wild, chaotic and surprised. We as human beings are psychological constructs. We have a DNA inprint but during our life other psychological constructs put ideas, beliefs, opinions, morals, values, preassumptions etc. in us. So we become the same and in some way still unique. We think we are our body, we think we must become something or someone, we think we must have a purpose, we think there is something to long for, we think we have free will, we think we have a choice, we thing there is right and wrong, we think we can determine our lives. In fact none of it exist because human beings don’t exist. They are psychological constructs trapped in a dualistic world which they created themselves. Because of this every now and then we experience cramped energy inside of us. There must be more in life. Loniging arises. Desires as well. So, we start searching, we try to find a guru, we buy more stuff to fele better, we take anti depressants, we become addicted, we eat more sugar, we make plans etc. There is no need for that is a world of boundless energy which is all. All is one. All is everything and nothing. Nothing really happens. It is just energy shifting around from one place to another. Apparently. A wall is not a wall, it is just a wall walling. Liberation for human beings and materials can only be obtained when the I, the Me collapses. All that will be left is boundless energy formless and shaped in forms. All of what is written here is just an idea, a description of life itself. They are just words. There is not truth in it. Nothing is true. Not even life itself knows truth. It does not even know itself. It just is. Like the human being without the I. It just is. If the I (ego, identifcations, the personhood, the Self) in human beings collapses more and more, liberation will be there, here and everywhere and rights for human beings and materials will not even be here. Entities shaped in bodies will automatically take care of this Earth as a steward. Stewards that act from being. Being boundless energy of itself. Unfortunately liberation can not be planned. Like life itself can not be planned. It just is. But we can spread these words without any intention, goal or plan. So, this will not make any difference except for the ones that resonate with it. When they are in that resonance they will know the I is not there. The I might even explode or implode. But no one can tell if it will happen. It can happen anywhere. Apparently.
Ontwijk het woord ‘rechten’; gebruik liever de term ‘wederzijdse verbinding’.
Het begrip ‘recht’ impliceert ‘bezit’, terwijl de nieuwe visie “het einde van bezit” weerspiegelt.
We hebben de afgelopen 70 jaar gezien dat rechten leiden tot een claimcultuur waarin geld de hoofdrol is gaan spelen.
Maar de allereerste vraag die gesteld dient te worden, is: Moeten wij de Universele Verklaring van de wederzijdse verbinding tussen Materiaal en Mens in het Engels schrijven?
In Nederland niet, doch, om de vorming van de nieuwe wereldtaal tegemoet te komen, stel ik voor het parallel/simultaan, zowel in het Nederlands als in het Engels, op te maken.
Ieder woord dient gewogen te worden. ‘Mutual obligation’ impliceert niet enkel een verbinding, maar ook ‘verplichting’ en ‘verbintenis’. Het is een contract dat twee partijen betreft. Het is een ‘huwelijk’, het is wederzijds, waarna zo’n dergelijk contract nog steeds kan stranden.
In deze zin kunnen wij een Universele Verklaring van de wederzijdse verbinding tussen Materiaal en Mens als een dertiende amendement* beschouwen, een anti-slavernijwet, die het materiaal vrij maakt en optilt tot een hoger plan.
Aan de ene kant ‘dient’ materiaal ons; wij mensen echter zullen (het) materiaal ten dienste moeten staan. Het is inherent aan het leven. Hierbij gaat het uiteraard om verantwoordelijkheid en vrije wil.
Laten we niet spreken over een schuldbekentenis, maar eerder over een nieuwe kijk op onze relatie met de wereld.
Het denken over de nieuwe relatie tussen materiaal en mens is mijns inziens een signaal dat ons systeem zich dient te wijzigen en ook gaat veranderen in een wereld die de grote Tijdsperiode van Aquarius cq De Waterman tegemoet treedt. Een periode waarin grote en grootse geestelijke ontwikkelingen zullen vrijkomen.
Wanneer wij gast zijn binnen ons gesloten systeem, dan roept dit direct de vraag op: Maar wie is dan de Gastheer?
* gerefereert wordt hier aan het amendement van de Amerikaanse Grondwet dat in 1865 de slevernij wenste af te schaffen.
So:
Avoid the word ‘rights’; it is better to use the term ‘mutual obligation’.
The notion ‘rights’ implies ‘possession’, while the new vision mirrors ‘the end of possession’.
In the past 70 years we have seen that rights lead to a claiming cultur in which money plays the lead.
But the very first question we need to ask ourselves is: Should we write te Universal Declaration of mutual obligation between material and man in English? Not in Holland I suppose, but to accomodate the new world-language I suggest to create it parallel and in a simultanious manor, both in Dutch and in English.
Every word needs to be weighed and considered. ‘Mutual obligation’ implies not only a connection, but also a commitment and an alliance. It is a contract from both parties. It is a marriage, it is mutual and such a contract still can fail itself. In this sence we are able to look upon the Universal Declaration of mutual obligation between material and man as a thirteenth amendement*, an anti-slaverybill which frees Material and lifts it to a higher degree.
On one hand (the) Material ‘serves’ us, however we (men, the people) should serve (the) Material. It’s inherent to life. It concerns here responsablility and free will. Let us not speak about a confession of guilt, but rather of a new insight about our relationship towards the world.
In my view the thinking about this new relationship between Material and Mankind is the signal that our system needs to and is going to change in a world that is heading to the big Time era of Aquarius cq The Waterman. A Period in which large and great spiritual developments will be set free. When we are guests in our closed system, then immediately the question comes to light: Who is the Host?
* refered to here is the Amendement of the American Constitution that wished to erase slavery in 1865.